Creative Commons is Six

Creative Commons Sticker on My MacBook ProIt’s hard to believe, but the Creative Commons project is 6 today. The project grew out of the battles over copyright and just after the licenses were released I wrote about it and all the content on this site has been under a Creative Commons license since then. That’s over 350 posts that anyone is freely able to share as long as they give me credit and don’t use it for commercial purpose. The genius of the CC project is that it appeals to our generosity in making it easier to share and find things that we can legally use to create new works. One of the things that initially made me excited about sharing photos on Flickr was the ease at adding CC licensing to your uploads very easily. Now I’m sharing 7,333 photos that are all under an Attribution-Noncommercial license, so if you want to use any photo you can if you give me credit and don’t sell it. There are almost 13 million photos on Flickr with the same licence and millions more under other CC licenses.
To put my money where my mouth is, I’ve also joined the Creative Commons network which gives me an OpenID and a page that lets people know about the works that I’ve licensed (as well as a t-shirt, a sticker, and a cool USB stick with songs by Jonathan Coulton on it). If you create work I would encourage you to think about licensing it and if you look at photos, or video, read things online, or listen to music or audio, you can search and find almost anything that you legally share, remix and reuse. It’s a wonderful new world thanks to the Creative Commons project and I’m proud and happy to be part of it.

December 16, 2008 ,

Five Years of Creative Commons

cc.logo.circle.pngFive years ago today things changed online in the copyfight. Frustration with the increasingly hostile environment surrounding intellectual property and a fundamental shift in copyright law in the United States, a brilliant and positive initiative called Creative Commons launched. It shifted things around by not asking “how can I stop people from stealing things?,” but by asking “how I can I share what I make and work with others?” With a set of licenses that were legal as well human and machine readable, an amazing amount of creativity and collaboration became possible.
This blog had started a few months before the launch in December of 2002 and I licensed all my blog posts from that point on. Now I have 331 posts that can be shared and remixed as long as it’s noncommercial and I’ve given credit. All of my 6,547 public photos on Flickr have the same license. The 10 episodes of the Bad Metaphor podcast are also licensed and everything that I create and put online will be licensed in a similar way.
It’s been a positive and encouraging experience to use the licenses as I’ve been able to meet and work with people from all over the world because of the project. The more that you give and share, the more you get back.

Continue…

December 15, 2007 ,

Creative Commons New Licenses

I’m a big fan of the Creative Commons project. They keep expanding the project with new licenses more specifically targeted to music and countries other than the USA. You can search for content and create your own derivative works. Many people are embracing the model of sharing and respecting the audience. Right now I’m listening to a stream from Magnatune who have built their online record label around Creative Commons licenses. The reason that I’m writing now is that they’ve revamped their licenses and I’ve revised my licensing. Now the written content on the site is licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 deed. There also is a new logo that you’ll see at the bottom of the site. That means that you can use anything that I’ve written on the site as long as you give me credit and you aren’t using it commercially and you can also modify what I’ve written as long as you allow others the same right. Everyone should contribute to the commons!

June 7, 2004 , , ,

Free Culture

Lawrence Lessig is Stanford Law Professor who founded the Center for Internet Law and Society. He’s a cogent writer on the intersection between intellectual property law and creativity. I first noticed him (although I now realize that I’d read him earlier) when he represented Eric Eldred in the U.S. Supreme Court case to overturn the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. He’s also chair of the Creative Commons project which is how this very blog is licensed. His most recent book is Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity and in a great example of putting your money (or book) where your mouth is he’s licenced the book (and made a freely downloadable version of Free Culture) under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License. You can also buy Free Culture in an old-style paper version with the pages all bound together. Derivative versions have started appearing already with one of the neatest ones that developed was AKMA’s idea to have people read and record chapters, which is almost completely done after a couple of days. I’ve downloaded the PDF version and I’m reading it now. It’s great and I’m going to buy the print version to finish reading it. I have to admit that I’m a bit of a policy wonk and I love the argument that he’s making in contextualizing the development of law, culture and public policy. Maybe it’s a Canadian trait with so much of our national identity wrapped up with communication technologies and being the birthplace of Marshall McLuhan and Harold Innis (who linked “Empire and Communications“). I’ll end with a quotation from Free Culture by Lawrence Lessig:
“A free culture is not a culture without property; it is not a culture in which artists don

March 30, 2004 , , , , , , , , ,